Do some searches, there is a lot of good information out there, although you will ultimately see many different opinions in the matter. Cryptocrayon (marine ich - it's a different creature than freshwater ich) was my intro to keeping a tank! I am just about into the final stretch (last week!) of my very long fishless cycle (12 weeks) so have somewhat recently done a lot of research myself.
There are many treatment options, the ones most people prefer being copper, quinine sulfate (used more for copper resistant strains of crypto, and yes they do exist), or hypo. Be careful with hypo, it does stress the fish somewhat, and you have to be spot on with your salinities - if you mess it up, you may either fail to eradicate the crypto, or over-stress your fish. Additionally, like copper, different species tolerate hypo in differently.
Each treatment type has its own benefits and downsides, but do realize that you have to treat all of your fish now, regardless of whether they show visible signs of the disease or not. In order to not reinfect them, you do have to go fish-fallow in your display tank for a certain amount of time. How long is up to your own risk profile, but many people will say between 4 - 10 weeks. Most strains eggs will hatch (and then die within 24-48 hours of not finding a host) within 3 - 4 weeks, but there have been studies where eggs have lived out to 99 days - hence my own ultra cautious 12 week fallow period. Please note that is incredibly rare. I have also read that temperature will not speed up their life cycle in the same way that it does with freshwater ich (they're not the same creature). Temperature may have had a role in the eggs laying dormant for longer however, but I have not read any definitive studies towards that.
So, while I would highly recommend treating your fish and going fallow for a long period of time, there is another philosophy towards crypto, which is essentially what Herbie alluded to. That is basically saying, you leave it alone, and strengthen your fish's immune system, with the idea being that they can beat the parasite back themselves. This keeps the parasite at sub-visibly infected levels, and for many people this is enough, as the fish look and act healthy. It's not something I personally would do, as I can't help but imagine the fish being constantly infected at a very low level - I mean, this is a parasite that actively feeds on, and preys on your fish! I do not have anything against people that support this philosophy though, and it works fine - people have seemingly healthy fish that display no signs of stress and live long lives. They are likely carriers, however, and anytime something happens that stresses the tank, you risk a flare-up.
Ultimately, it is up to you to treat how you feel most appropriate, but I hope that whatever treatment you choose works out well for you and your fish! Good luck!