The Reef Hobby- An Endangered Species?

SkullV

New member
Very interesting post from Reef2Reef, figured I would post it over here.

Unique Corals on reef2reef said:
Back from MACNA, and we’re sort of easing into the post-conference tasks ahead, getting ready for the busy “coral season.”

And guess what?

The hobby is in trouble. Again.

Yeah, really. It’s not “in a few years…” It’s not “At some point in the near future…” It’s not “Eventually…”

It’s right now.



The Reef Hobby- An Endangered Species?-sunset-coral-reef.jpg

Don't believe me? Take a look:

NOAA Lists 20 New Corals as Threatened Under the Endangered Species Act. :: NOAA Fisheries

The U.S. Government has enacted legislation that can seriously impact- or even end- the reef hobby as we know it. Protections for 15 Indo Pacific species have been afforded, meaning that they will be listed as threatened. Species listed include members of the genus Acropora, Euphyllia, and others.

The collection, importation, and distribution of these corals is essentially illegal. And this is just the beginning. According to some observers, this listing might extend to the genus level, meaning that trade in all Acropora, for example, could be considered off limits-banned entirely, or at best, severely restricted. In other words, the legislation is so sweeping that, regardless of how the corals were sourced, they could be off limits to commerce.

Look, I am all for passing legislation that protects the reefs, up to and including bans on legitimately endangered species. But the implication that these, or any species, was severely affected solely because of the ornamental aquarium trade is biased, inaccurate, and downright unfair. The problem here is that this opens the door to far more sweeping, far more restrictive general bans.

It means that even maricultured, aquacultured, and otherwise captive-propagated corals could be illegal to sell or purchase. They would be treated in the same sweeping manner as if you were trying to sell White Tigers or some other endangered animals. Under this type of ban, the club frag swap would be as illegal as a bunch of drug dealers swapping samples of crack. Yep.

This is the real deal. The end of the line for our innocence. It's the sum of all fears… All of the corals that we frag, propagate, and, yes- treasure, could be, in theory, removed from our hobby altogether. For that matter, our hobby could be removed altogether.

Despite the apparently reviewing enormous amounts of scientific data, government legislators came to the conclusion that the aquarium trade is more damaging to the reefs than say, recreational yachting, tuna fishing, agricultural runoff, bilge pumping, and “eco tourism.”

Despite the fact that the reef aquarium hobby and associated coral propagation industry is absolutely saturated with conscientious purveyors who have worked to grow out thousands of coral frags in their facilities over the years so that wild collection would become unnecessary.

Is it the final countdown? Time to party “like it’s 1999?"

Who knows for sure at this point?

What we do know is that this legislation represents the biggest threat to the hobby yet.

A celebration must be in order for “Snorkel Bob”, “For the Fishes”, and the other “reef hugger” pseudo-“environmentalist” groups, their reactionary, ill-informed masses, and their ridiculously perverted, largely mis-directed agendas. Through their highly publicized, over-the-top, ridiculously exaggerated and hyper-inflated “data” showing the “egregious" amount of damage the aquarium trade has done to the coral reefs, they may have dealt a decisive blow to a largely responsible, multi-million dollar industry that employs tens of thousands of people worldwide.

Hmm…The aquarium industry causes more damage to corals than a bunch of ignorant, sunblock-smeared tourists flailing about wildly with their rented swim fins over delicate coral reefs, after being delivered by boats with diesel-powered engines and bilge pumps, could do? Apparently so. The mind boggles…

A vivid memory of mine from MACNA in Dallas was when none other than Jean-Michel Cousteau, who, after walking the show floor filled with dozens of coral vendors offering propagated frags, and manufacturers hawking highly advanced equipment for coral care, literally muttered to himself, “I had no idea…”

Why is that? Because we- and that includes many of us in the reef keeping world- hobbyists, vendors, manufacturers- the whole ball of wax- have done a not-so-good job of letting the rest of the non-aquarium-keeping world know that we’re actually a bunch of really cool people who definitely give a darn about the state of the world’s reefs, probably more than the very people, loud though they may be, who are trying to shut down the hobby forever.

Yeah, we got a beat down from a bunch of people who have no clue whatsoever about what the hobby and industry are really like; our ethos, values, and how minimal our impact really is compared to virtually every other threat to the reefs, and to corals in particular.

We are the proverbial “low hanging fruit”- the easiest of the potential targets…Our lobbying power is, apparently, the weakest of all of the apparent groups associated with damage to coral reefs.

So, to a reefer- ALL corals will truly become “LE”- won’t they?

We flat out screwed up. I know I did.

Yes, this is our wake up call. I’m giving all of us the proverbial “b- - - - slap.” And I’m starting with myself.

Instead of writing an article about how the reef hobby is virtually the stewards of the reefs for an airline magazine, National Geographic, or the New York Times, I have been writing pieces about aquascaping and why you should grow macro algae in your sump. I’ve been lecturing about nutrient control and export at MACNA, instead of urging my fellow reefers to become empowered and rally behind those fighting the external threats facing the hobby.

We go nuts on forums and argue about the merits of ULNS, zeolites, what protein skimmer is the best, and which version of the @$@#$%# Acropora is the “real deal”, when, in reality, we all need to be just devoting a fraction of that time telling the non-reefing world about all of the cool stuff we do with corals. Most speakers and authors, such as myself, give a mere passing reference to the problems facing our industry during our talks, and don’t effectively use our “influence” and notoriety to let the outside world know that WE are the true conservationists here.

We don’t “vote with our pocketbooks” enough, making a loud enough tussle to discourage those within our industry from supporting non-sustainable livestock operations and suppliers.


And what did we do to stop this stuff as a hobby and industry?

Not a whole lot, actually. Yeah, I’m calling us all out again: Hobbyists, industry people too. "STARS" OF AQUARIUM-BASED TV SHOWS!! Where are you guys when you could really do some good at reaching a broader audience than virtually anyone else in the aquatics field at the moment? You think that just because you build aquariums for ignorant masses that the potential ban doesn't affect YOU?

Crickets.

Silence.

We collectively bury our head in the sand year after year, hoping that “they” in some industry lobby that we have made little effort to learn about (PIJAC) can maneuver to stop these bills from being implemented, without our support, save an occasional "attaboy" or nod to an industry advocate like Ret Talbot. We hear the talks at conferences, but we continue to believe that these things are the vague and pointless ramblings of a few “Chicken Littles”, claiming that the sky is falling.

Guess what? The sky IS falling. It actually fell. We screwed around too long, and now the Clownfish are coming home to the anemone for good. The “environmentalists”, in their zealous, unfocused frenzy to get some progress by taking out ANY available target, are mobilized and winning this battle.

How serious is it this time? Well, at MACNA, I had occasion to talk to two of the guys leading the charge for the industry against this threat, ORA’s Dustin Dorton, and Live Aquaria’s Kevin Kohen. Both of these guys were visibly disturbed by the NOAA ruling, and when guys of this caliber get shaken, it’s time for all of us to take it very seriously.

Am I overreacting here? I don't think so- not this time.


Okay, I’ve pointed out what we did wrong. It’s time to talk about what we can do to help.

First, individual hobbyists can spark wider discussions about these topics on the message boards…We need to really let everyone know what’s going on. We need to encourage individuals, clubs, stores, vendors, and anyone associated with the hobby/industry to send monetary donations to the PIJAC (Pet Industry Join Advisory Council):

PIJAC Marine Ornamental Defense Fund 1146 19th Street NW, Suite 350 Washington, D.C. 20036

You can call them at 202-452-1525x1020, or find out more information at PIJAC.org/marine

All monies collected will be used to help pay the cost for PIJAC’s legal team fight this legislation, and will go directly to protecting the marine ornamentals hobby.

If you think that you can’t get your friends to donate easily, I suggest a grassroots Facebook campaign similar to that used for the “ALS Ice Bucket Challenge”- perhaps the PIJAC “Salt Bucket Challenge”, whatever…call out your friends, fellow vendors, industry and non-industry types! Something. Anything.
 

SkullV

New member
Part 2

Unique Corals on Reef2Reef said:
Second, clubs can have frag swap events and raffles to donate a portion of the proceeds to this fund. Even more important, clubs and even individual hobbyists should reach out into the broader aquarium hobby, and even to the non-aquarium hobby, to solicit support and donations to help this cause.

The detractors are taking our hobby away from the very people who have the most respect and love for the reefs- US! It’s time we fight back…but not with venom and frustration. We need to fight back by letting the rest of the world know the real facts about the impact of our hobby and industry on the wild reefs, and the true amount of concern and caring that we have for these irreplaceable natural resources. If we’ve ever needed to take a stand- now is truly the time.

We need to channel that well-known passion that we all have for this hobby to fight for its accurate representation to the non aquarium world, and indeed, its very survival.

Yes, the reefs are in trouble. And no- our hobby is not the sole cause of it, or even a significant cause of it. We as a group must show no tolerance for non-sustaibale, unethical practices that can endanger these priceless natural resources. We need to let the legislators know that we care more than they could ever imagine, and that we need to enact legislation against those who truly are destroying the reefs without regard for their well-being.

Are we up to the challenge?

Yeah, I think we are…as long as we get our heads out of the sand an accept this legislation as the very real threat that it is, and mobilize our considerable resources to fight it.

The future of this hobby depends on it.

Stay on top of things…Stay focused on the real issues, support the good being done by hobbyists every day-and let others know. Do some real good.

And stay wet…

Scott Fellman
 

ColaAddict

New member
I don't buy anything wild anymore, coral wise. My recent buys have all been aquacultured.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It doesnt seem to matter if all of your coral buys are aquacultured. They will be illegal. I dont get it and it annoys me. Yes, people take from the reef but to preserve and enjoy not destroy. It bugs me that something like this could gain any traction when you have companies doing things a million times more harmful with zero intention of conservation or even cleaning up after themselves. Reefers unite!
 

Jason R

New member
I don't buy anything wild anymore, coral wise. My recent buys have all been aquacultured.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You could still be breaking the law according to this law apparently. If something is illegal it doesn't matter where it is made or how you acquired it.
 

ColaAddict

New member
You could still be breaking the law according to this law apparently. If something is illegal it doesn't matter where it is made or how you acquired it.
What I mean is that I'm trying not to contribute or promote harvesting wild corals. I bet a lot of wild corals collected end up dying and wasted in harvesters/vendors/reefers tanks. It does suck that even aqua cultured will be illegal. Good thing I'm done collecting for now :) now if I can just keep my tank from crashing in the future :/


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

ultimatemj

Active member
It doesn't seem rational to use the ivory trade philosophy (make ownership illegal to quench demand and ergo the amount of poaching). You can't culture more ivory from ivory.

That said, it makes sense to do something to keep greed from scorching the earth; "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children"
 
Last edited:

Jason R

New member
What I mean is that I'm trying not to contribute or promote harvesting wild corals. I bet a lot of wild corals collected end up dying and wasted in harvesters/vendors/reefers tanks. It does suck that even aqua cultured will be illegal. Good thing I'm done collecting for now :) now if I can just keep my tank from crashing in the future :/


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Depends how illegal they make it. I'm sure if you somehow had a bag of cocaine in your house from 100 years ago you could still get arrested for it.
 

ColaAddict

New member
It doesn't seem rational to using the ivory trade philosophy (make ownership illegal to quench demand and ergo the amount of poaching). You can't culture more ivory from ivory.

That said, it makes sense to do something to keep greed from scorching the earth; "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children"
Well said. I agree


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

madjoe

Premium member
Well then we just gonna have to come up with code names and black market r stuff we grew in r own tanks . Gonna have ro take this site underground :p
 
Just grow what u have now and don't forget to share the love to others so when something goes wrong with the tank u have someone to fall back to. Do all of this under the radar. lol As a matter of fact we don't need the ocean anymore we have all the goods already just embrace it take good care of it and share.One day when all things go south in the ocean the only once standing would be our tanks.
 
Last edited:

madjoe

Premium member
Every body to menards place. I think that we be wasy to find dammit they just gotta follow those u r useing 300 percent more electric then your eco friendly neighbors letters and bam we caught . Dammit i need a windmill
 

ColaAddict

New member
Every body to menards place. I think that we be wasy to find dammit they just gotta follow those u r useing 300 percent more electric then your eco friendly neighbors letters and bam we caught . Dammit i need a windmill
Lol. I've gotten that letter multiple times :)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
The coral industry just needs to be better managed rather then a complete ban. Its seems that lately people suggest these bills just to get there name on something, Rather then look at a solution that can benefit the industry and the reef. The law makers look for the fast and most public way to get these bills passed. Groups like Sea Shepard do more harm then good in some points. All people here from the encounter of the diver and Sea Shepard is that they were attacked. There was no mention, as far as I know, that the collection diver had all the proper permits and abided by the rules and regulations that were in place. No one even mentioned that it was how he made his money legally. The government is great for making new committees for studying this or that but not in this case. I would have no problem moving to Hawaii to manage a group of people that provided checks and balances to the divers, aquaculture centers and importers. Money needs to be put into cultivation rather a total ban.
 

mishmaster

Member
NOAA, that's a new one for me. Looks like there is no shortage of government agencies out there dishing out laws in order to keep themselves busy which then keeps funds rolling in.


Regulation is needed, not a ban. When did making something illegal stop someone from doing something?
 
Last edited:

SkullV

New member
More on this situation (continued in next post). Take a look at the names on the Aquatics Committee for PIJAC. This situation seems to be getting serious enough to garner some serious industry attention.

masna.org said:
MEMORANDUM

To: MASNA
From: Aquatics Committee
Sandy Moore, Co-Chair
Chris Buerner, Co-Chair
Julian Sprung
Dustin Dorton
Kevin Kohen
Laura Reid

Date: September 8, 2014

Do you love corals?

Following a 2009 petition from the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) to list 83 reef-building coral
species for protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), on August 28, 2014, the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed 20 species of corals as threatened species. The final listing
includes 5 coral species from the Caribbean, and 15 Indo-Pacific coral species from the genera
Acropora, Euphyllia, Montipora, Pavona, Porites, and Seriatopora.

NMFS had originally proposed to list 66 reef-building species as threatened and endangered in
December, 2012. However, based upon substantial scientific information submitted by the Pet Industry
Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC) and other parties, NMFS determined only 20 of these species warranted
listing as threatened species. Such scientific information included the submission of a scientific report
developed by Dr. Charlie Veron, a world-renowned coral expert. PIJAC participated in the development
of Dr. Veron’s work, and provided financial support enabling completion of this work.

In its final listing determination, NMFS elected not to apply the general ESA Section 9 “take”
prohibitions to the newly-listed species. The term “take” is broadly defined to include a range of actions,
including harassing, harming, injuring or killing a listed species. Instead, NMFS solicited comments
regarding the appropriate scope of ESA Section 9 regulations, and indicated that it will consult with
federal agencies and other partners to develop appropriate recovery strategies for the species.

PIJAC believes it likely that NMFS will apply the ESA Section 9 “take” prohibitions to the newly-listed
coral species in the near future, consistent with prior agency actions. Application of these take
prohibitions by NMFS could severely restrict or eliminate trade in these species. Such prohibitions may
apply to both corals in the wild, as well as farm-raised corals. Such actions would be devastating to the
marine aquarium hobby. Aquarium conferences, retail stores, wholesale suppliers, and coral farms
would see an immediate direct impact, while manufacturers, dry goods suppliers, and mail order pet
suppliers would experience the resulting loss of business too.
 
Last edited:

SkullV

New member
Contnued:

masna.org said:
While we await further regulatory actions, anti-aquarium organizations will surely strive to create a
social stigma for the aquarium industry by claiming, for example, that we are “trafficking in threatened
and endangered species.” The emotion surrounding the subject will likely inflame public opinion and
could motivate NMFS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to enact stricter importation rules on all
corals.

NMFS’ action to list these species was driven by a petition filed by CBD. CBD indicated in its petition
that climate change presents a significant risk for these species, requiring listing of these species under
the ESA. CBD, effectively, is attempting to use the ESA as a tool to regulate greenhouse gas
emissions. NMFS, likewise, relied on the effects of climate change to justify listing these 20 species.
However, scientific information developed by world-renowned scientists indicate that none of the 20
listed coral species warrant listing under the ESA. These experts have stated in recent comments that
NMFS’ final rule is not supported by the best available scientific information.

The Solution

PIJAC acted quickly to provide the best available scientific information to NMFS in response to CBD’s
petition to list corals. PIJAC’s efforts are largely responsible for the dramatic reduction in the number of
species listed, and the fact that none of these species were listed as endangered. But that is not
enough. PIJAC must continue to work with the scientific community to develop and submit scientific
information regarding marine species. PIJAC must also remain engaged in the legal and policy issues
arising now that these 20 coral species have been listed by NMFS under the ESA.

This is a time consuming and expensive process, and it requires your support. All funds donated to
PIJAC’s Aquatic Defense Fund will be directed toward either this specific process, or other existing anti-
aquarium campaigns.

Many eminent coral reef scientists are dismayed by the listing. ESA take prohibitions may be at odds
with the best plan for the recovery of any coral species that might ever need a recovery plan-- coral
farming and restoration. ESA prohibitions may dramatically limit or eliminate conservation and
education programs.

Please support PIJAC’s effort to defend our hobby against this and other actions including ones that
aim directly to shut down our hobby. You can do so by making a donation, small or large, here:
www.pijac.org/marine.

Inspire your friends, your pet store, your aquarium club to do the same.
If you have any questions for PIJAC, contact marshall@pijac.org.
 
Top